In the last day of the event, reflecting after my attendance of several presentations, it occured to me that some were emphasising reflection on practice over informed practice. In other words, some of the lessons presenters drew from their experiences were actually highly predictable and already known, based on literature already available.
In other words, instead of the expected
Informed practice to intervention to post-reflectionI was encountering
Intervention to post-reflection to (pre-existing) informed practice.I wonder... do we in e-learning circles tend to do more than we actually read?